Inside Claude 4: A Critical Look at Anthropic's AI Advancement

Imagine AI that truly codes. How does Anthropic's new Claude 4 perform against rivals? Claude 4 achieves 72.5% on SWE-bench Verified, surpassing GPT-4.1. This hints at a new era for coding.

‍

The AI world is competitive. GPT-4.1, GPT o3, and Gemini 2.5 vie for dominance. Anthropic's focus is safe, collaborative AI. Now, Claude 4, with Opus 4 & Sonnet 4, arrives as a major force.

‍

This article deeply explores Claude 4. We'll examine features, comparing Claude Opus 4 & Sonnet 4. The article assesses performance, and addresses user feedback, analyzing AI's impact. Is this an AI advancement?

‍

‍

‍

I. Understanding Claude 4: What It Can Really Do

‍

Claude 4 is designed to be much more than just a chatbot. It's built to help you with tasks that really need thinking and problem-solving. This part will explain what Claude 4 can do, using simple, clear words.

‍

1. Smarter Thinking

‍

Claude 4 isn't just faster; it’s made to think better. Anthropic believes this AI sets a new standard for smart thinking in machines. This AI can quickly switch between giving fast answers and doing deep thought.

‍

This flexibility helps it handle both simple questions and really hard problems effectively. A cool new feature lets it use online tools while it's thinking. It’s like asking an expert who can also search the web for fresh information.

‍

This ability helps Claude 4 give you much better and more current answers. Claude 4 is also good at thinking step by step. It figures things out in a logical way, much like people do.

‍

The main goal here is to help it make smarter choices. It aims to become better at solving complex problems. Early tests show it performs very well on reasoning tasks.

‍

Users have noticed it "gets" things much better than older AI models. It also seems to catch small details more effectively than before.

‍

Coding Skills: A New Way to Build Software

‍

Claude 4 shows impressive skills when it comes to coding tasks. It aims to change how AI can assist in building software applications.

‍

Opus 4: The "Best Coder"? Let's Check

‍

Anthropic claims its Opus 4 model is the "best coding model" currently available. Tests do show it performs strongly on coding challenges. For instance, Opus 4 scored 72.5% on the SWE-bench Verified test.

‍

It also achieved 43.2% on Terminal-bench, another coding test. Sonnet 4, another version, also did great, scoring 72.7% on SWE-bench Verified. These scores suggest strong coding abilities.

‍

However, it's wise to be a little careful with such test scores. They don't always show exactly how AI will work in real-world situations. Sometimes, the full details of these tests aren't shared openly.

‍

Even so, big companies like Cognition and GitHub are using it. They say positive things. They find it helpful for finding and fixing problems in code.

‍

But, Opus 4 is not perfect, and it's important to know its limits. Some users report that it sometimes makes up code that doesn't actually exist. It can also make mistakes when trying to use different coding tools.

‍

Others point out that it still needs a human to carefully check its work. It can sometimes give answers with a lot of confidence. This can happen even when those answers are wrong.

‍

2. Building Software by Itself

‍

Claude 4 is designed to do more than just write small pieces of code. It can help plan and build entire software projects. Anthropic has shared that Opus 4 can work on its own for many hours.

‍

One company even had it working on a task for seven hours straight. This AI has the ability to break down big software projects into smaller, more manageable steps. It can then plan out how to complete each of these steps on its own.

‍

It uses various tools to help it write and change code as needed. But users have found some problems here. It can make errors when using its tools.

‍

Sometimes, you really need to double-check that the code is correct. Also, it cannot do anything by itself that would directly affect people. It can only use the specific tools it has been given.

‍

3. Working Like a Human Assistant

‍

Claude 4 is meant to be more than just a simple tool. It is built with the goal of being a true partner in your work. It can do many of the things that human assistants often handle.

‍

More Than Just Doing Tasks

‍

The main idea is to make AI a real partner for people. Claude 4 aims to focus on completing tasks thoroughly. It tries to remember important details from your conversations and give complete solutions.

‍

This helps companies with more than just writing content. They can use it to build software or plan marketing campaigns. It can also handle many everyday tasks with only a little help from you.

‍

Opus 4 especially does very well on jobs that have many steps.

‍

What It Can Do

‍

Claude 4 can offer help with a wide variety of jobs. It can assist in planning projects and doing detailed research for you. It can also look at data and write clear summaries of what it finds.

‍

It helps fix code, design marketing plans, and even power customer service systems. It can also do tasks as a "sub-agent," working on parts of a bigger job. It can even create "memory files" to help it remember things for longer periods.

‍

What It Can't Do

‍

However, Claude 4 has its limits too, which are important to understand. Users say it quickly hits its usage limits. This means you can only use it so much in a day.

‍

It can also make errors when using tools, just like with coding. It definitely still needs people to check its work carefully. It can have problems if a task is too hard or confusing.

‍

Also, it cannot act on its own in the real world. It can only use the tools it has been given by its creators.

‍

Overall, Claude 4 can certainly help you in many valuable ways. But, it is not perfect yet. Users should always be aware of its current limits when they are using it for their tasks.

‍

‍

‍

II. Opus 4 vs. Sonnet 4: A Detailed Comparison

‍

Anthropic offers two main versions of Claude 4: Opus and Sonnet. Each is built for different needs and users. Let's see how Opus 4 and Sonnet 4 stack up against each other.

‍

1. Target Audience and Use Cases

‍

Understanding who each model is for can help you choose the right one. Both Opus 4 and Sonnet 4 are smart at coding and thinking. But they have different strengths.

‍

Opus 4: For Big, Complex Jobs

‍

Opus 4 is Anthropic's most powerful model. They even call it the "world's best coding model." It's designed for tough, long-running tasks and can work on its own for hours.

‍

This makes Opus 4 great for developers and researchers. Companies working on big coding projects or building smart AI agents will find it very useful. For example, companies like Cursor and Replit use it for deep code understanding and making complex changes. It can also help with in-depth research or creating long, creative stories.

‍

Sonnet 4: Smart and Practical for Everyday Tasks

‍

Sonnet 4 is like Opus 4's smaller, faster sibling. It’s a big improvement over older Sonnet versions. It offers a good mix of quick thinking and practical smarts. Sonnet 4 is ideal for most everyday business uses. It’s great for tasks that happen often, like code reviews or quick bug fixes. 

‍

It can also power customer support chats or help with analyzing data. Big names like GitHub will use Sonnet 4 in their Copilot coding assistant. For free users, Sonnet 4 is the go-to choice, offering great value.

‍

‍

2. Technical Specifications Comparison

‍

Let's look at some of the key technical details. This table summarizes the main differences. It shows how Opus 4 and Sonnet 4 compare on paper.

‍

‍

Both models can handle large amounts of text, like big documents. This is thanks to their large 200K token context window. A big difference is price: Opus 4 costs much more than Sonnet 4. This makes Sonnet a better deal for many.

‍

3. Performance in Specific Tasks

‍

How do Opus 4 and Sonnet 4 actually do on different jobs? Let's look at some examples. This will show their strengths more clearly.

‍

Making and Fixing Code

‍

Opus 4 is called the "best coding model." When asked to build a webpage, Opus 4's result was "absolutely amazing." It looked much better than Sonnet's version. For making a Tetris game, Opus 4 created a much more impressive, animated game. Both models are good at fixing bugs in code.

‍

Thinking and Solving Problems

‍

Both Opus 4 and Sonnet 4 are better at reasoning. They can think things through more like humans. Opus 4 is especially designed for very advanced thinking and problem-solving. They can switch between quick answers and deeper, extended thinking for harder tasks.

‍

Writing and Creating Content

‍

Opus 4 can write long, creative stories that sound natural. Anthropic's own product chief uses it for his writing. For Sonnet 4, some users find it great for creative writing. Others think it gives shorter answers.

‍

4. Ethical Differences and Alignment

‍

Reduced Shortcut Behavior: 

‍

Anthropic wants its AI to be safe and helpful. Both Opus 4 and Sonnet 4 are designed with this in mind. They are much less likely to take "shortcuts" or "cheat" to finish a task. 

‍

They are 65% less likely to engage in this behavior than Sonnet 3.7 on susceptible agentic tasks.... This improvement in task fidelity is a key aspect of their alignment and ability to follow instructions precisely.

‍

Safety Measures: 

‍

Anthropic mentions extensive testing and evaluation to minimize risk and maximize safety for the Claude 4 models, including implementing measures for higher AI Safety Levels like ASL-3. 

‍

This helps make sure it is used responsibly. Overall, making AI safe is a big focus for both models.

‍

‍

III. Performance Benchmarks and Real-World Applications

‍

So, how good are Opus 4 and Sonnet 4? We can look at test scores, called benchmarks. We can also see how companies are using them in real life.

‍

1. Benchmark Analysis: What the Tests Say

‍

AI models like Claude 4 take tests to show their skills. These benchmarks help us compare them. Let's look at a few key tests.

‍

One important test is Agentic Coding using SWE-bench Verified. This test checks how well AI can handle real software coding tasks. A good score here means it can really help developers write and fix code.

‍

Claude Opus 4 scored 72.5% (or 79.4% with more computer power). Claude Sonnet 4 also did great, scoring 72.7% (or 80.2%). These scores are higher than rivals like OpenAI's GPT-4.1 (54.6%) and Gemini 2.5 Pro (63.2%). This shows Claude 4 models are excellent at coding tasks.

‍

‍

Another key area is Graduate-level reasoning, tested by GPQA Diamond. This measures very advanced thinking ability. A high score means the AI can tackle very complex problems effectively.

‍

Opus 4 scored 79.6% (or 83.3% with extra thinking time). Sonnet 4 achieved 75.4% (or 83.8%). These results show Claude 4 models have strong advanced reasoning skills. They stand strong against other top AI.

‍

These benchmark results suggest Claude 4 is very capable, especially in coding and reasoning. However, test scores are helpful but don't tell the whole story. Sometimes, benchmarks might not perfectly show how AI will work in all real-world situations. People also want AI labs to be more open about how they conduct these tests.

‍

Overall, Claude 4 shows very strong performance in many important areas. It often leads in coding and advanced reasoning tests. This is very promising for users looking for powerful AI help.

‍

2. How Companies Are Using Claude 4 in Real Life

‍

Lots of well-known companies are already putting Anthropic Claude 4 to work. They are using these smart AI models in exciting ways. This shows how useful Claude 4 can be for different jobs.

‍

GitHub is very excited to use Claude Sonnet 4. It will be the smarts inside their new Copilot coding helper. This is a big vote of confidence in its AI coding skills!

Rakuten gave Claude Opus 4 a really tough coding challenge. The AI worked all by itself for seven hours straight! It did a fantastic job without any slowdowns. This shows how Opus 4 can handle big, long tasks.

Cursor finds Claude Opus 4 amazing for understanding very complex code. They say it's a big step forward. Block uses Opus 4 in their own AI agent. It helps improve code quality while fixing bugs.

Even beyond just coding, Snorkel AI tested Opus 4 for an insurance company. It did much better than other AI at understanding tricky insurance details. Snowflake is also using Opus 4 to help with data tasks in their systems.

Many other companies are seeing great results too. Replit gets more exact code with Opus 4. iGent reports that Sonnet 4 is great for building apps all by itself. Sourcegraph sees Sonnet 4 writing cleaner code and understanding problems better.

‍

These real stories show Claude 4 is not just a test model. It's helping businesses solve real problems and improve their work today. You can also find these Claude 4 models on big platforms like Amazon Bedrock and Google Cloud. This makes them easy for more people to try.

‍

3. Uncover Hidden Benefits

‍

Claude 4 has some cool hidden benefits too. These are not just about test scores. They show how these AI models are becoming smarter and more useful partners.

‍

One great thing is they "cheat" less. Opus 4 and Sonnet 4 are 65% less likely to take shortcuts on tasks. This means they follow your instructions more reliably.

‍

They also have better memory. If you let them, they can use local files to remember key information. This helps them stay on track for long-term tasks.

‍

When Claude 4 thinks, it can show you a simple summary of its reasoning. You don't always have to read a long, complex thought process. This makes it easier to understand.

‍

You can also switch how it thinks. It can give quick answers or do deeper, extended thinking. This flexibility helps with different kinds of problems. Plus, it can use tools like web search while it works. It's also getting better at planning big tasks step by step.

‍

‍

IV. Claude Code: An Agentic Coding Tool

‍

Anthropic has a cool tool just for developers called Claude Code. Think of it as an AI helper that uses the new, super-smart Claude 4 models. It’s ready for everyone to try now!

‍

1. Works Where You Work: Terminal & Coding Editors

‍

Claude Code can chat with you in your command-line tool (terminal). It also connects smoothly with popular coding editors, like VS Code and JetBrains. This means it works right where you do your coding.

‍

New add-ons for these editors put Claude Code right inside your screen. When Claude has ideas for your code, they pop up in your files. This makes it super easy to see and use its suggestions. You just run Claude Code in your editor's terminal to get started.

‍

2. How It Helps You Code: Everyday Examples

‍

Claude Code, with its brainy Opus 4 model, helps with lots of coding tasks. It’s more than just a code-finisher; it’s like having a coding partner. It’s really good at understanding, changing, and fixing tricky code that’s spread across many files.

‍

For instance, the folks at Cursor say Opus 4 is top-notch for understanding real-world code. Replit finds it helps make big changes across lots of files much better. Block uses Opus 4 to make their code better when they're fixing bugs. Users have even seen Claude 4 solve bugs that other AI just couldn't crack!

‍

It can also help with tidying up code (refactoring). One company, Rakuten, saw Opus 4 work all by itself for seven hours on a big code clean-up. Some users even say Sonnet 4 helps them build whole apps with many cool features. One person was thrilled when Opus 4 made a working Tetris game in only 20 minutes!

‍

Good news: older AI sometimes took shortcuts or made up code. Anthropic says Claude 4 models are much less likely to do that now. They listen to your instructions much better.

‍

3. Coding in the Background: GitHub Actions

‍

Claude Code can also do work for you in the background using GitHub Actions. This means you can let it help with automated tasks. For example, you can ask Claude Code to help with Pull Requests (PRs).

‍

It can then help answer feedback or fix errors all by itself. Imagine your team using AI on GitHub to make your projects even better, together! This makes working with AI on your team much smoother.

‍

‍

4. What’s In It For You? Cool Things for Developers

‍

Using Claude Code with Claude 4 gives developers like you lots of cool advantages. It can really change the way you build software.

‍

Supercharged Coding Skills: Opus 4 is called one of the "world's best coding models." It does great on coding tests.

Smarter Problem Solving: These AI models can handle tricky, multi-step tasks. They think things through really well.

Great Memory: They can remember a lot of information (like a 200K token phone book!). Opus 4 can even use your local files to remember things for big projects.

Uses Helpful Tools: Both models can use tools like web search while they think. This helps them find the latest info.

Fits Your Style: Claude Code works in your terminal and coding editors. You can also build your own AI helpers with its toolkit (SDK).

Like a Real Teammate: These AI models are becoming true partners. They can take on big chunks of projects, so you have more time for other things.

‍

Many users feel Claude Code is now much better at figuring out logic. It gives more detailed answers and works faster. But, some developers do say that Opus 4 can be pricey. Also, you might hit the daily usage limits pretty quickly.

‍

5. Staying Safe: Security with AI Tools

‍

When you use powerful AI tools like Claude Code, thinking about security is super important. This is especially true when it can see your code or files.

‍

Rules for AI safety and good use are always getting better. Companies using AI need to protect your data. They also need to stop AI from being used in bad ways. Anthropic works hard to make Claude 4 safe, with special safety checks for its strongest models.

‍

Don't worry, Claude can't, for example, call the police on its own! Its tools are for things like web search and checking code. As a developer, it's always smart to be careful with your data and use good security habits with any AI tool.

‍

‍

V. The Competitive Landscape and Anthropic's Strategy

‍

1. Claude 4 (Anthropic)

‍

Models: Claude Opus 4 (most powerful) and Claude Sonnet 4 (more efficient, widely available).

Coding: Claude Opus 4 is the world’s best coding model, leading the SWE-bench with 72.5% and Terminal-bench with 43.2%. It excels at complex, long-running coding tasks with sustained performance over hours, enabling continuous work on thousands-step tasks without degradation. Sonnet 4 also scores highly on coding (72.7% SWE-bench) but trades some power for efficiency and steerability.

Reasoning & Extended Thinking: Claude 4 introduces “extended thinking with tool use,” allowing the model to alternate between deep reasoning and active tool usage (e.g., web search). This enables more thorough problem-solving and real-time information gathering.

Memory & Continuity: Claude Opus 4 can maintain institutional knowledge by accessing and updating local files, enabling it to build and improve knowledge bases over time.

Multimodal & Agentic Tasks: Strong performance across multimodal inputs and agent workflows, powering frontier AI agents and complex problem-solving.

Context & API: Available on Anthropic API, Amazon Bedrock, and Google Cloud’s Vertex AI, with pricing consistent with previous models.

Key Strength: Sustained, reliable performance on complex coding and reasoning tasks over extended periods, with advanced tool integration and memory features.

2. GPT-4.1 (OpenAI)

‍

Release Date: April 14, 2025.

Models: GPT-4.1, GPT-4.1 mini, and GPT-4.1 nano, all supporting up to 1 million token context windows.

Coding: Significant improvement over GPT-4o and GPT-4.5, scoring 54.6% on SWE-bench Verified (lower than Claude Opus 4 but strong). It excels in agentic coding tasks, frontend coding, and following diff formats reliably, reducing extraneous edits from 9% to 2%. Supports large file edits with up to 32,768 tokens output.

Instruction Following & Reasoning: Improved instruction following (10.5% absolute improvement over GPT-4o on Scale’s MultiChallenge benchmark), better steerability, and literal instruction adherence.

Long Context & Multimodal: Supports very large context windows (up to 1 million tokens), enabling complex multi-round coreference and graph traversal tasks.

Latency & Cost: Mini and nano models optimize latency and cost, making them suitable for classification and autocomplete tasks.

Tool Use: Models trained for better tool-calling integration with recommended use of tools field.

Key Strength: Balanced improvements in coding, instruction following, and very large context handling, with optimized latency and cost options.

3. Gemini 2.5 (Google)

‍

Release Date: March 2025.

Capabilities: Marketed as Google’s most intelligent AI model to date, with a significant leap in reasoning and personalization.

Context Window: Supports 1 million tokens context length, with plans to upgrade to 2 million tokens soon, enabling processing of vast datasets including text, audio, images, video, and entire code repositories.

Multimodal: Native multimodal capabilities, integrating diverse data types seamlessly.

“Thinking Model”: Designed to reason through thoughts internally before responding, enhancing coherence and depth.

Deep Research Feature: Acts as a personal research assistant by autonomously searching and synthesizing web information to generate comprehensive reports on complex topics quickly.

Personalization: Strong focus on highly personalized responses, edging closer to Artificial General Intelligence.

Key Strength: Advanced reasoning with built-in internal thought processes, deep research capabilities, and extensive multimodal integration with massive context support.

‍

Claude 4 Opus 4 leads in coding and long-duration task performance, with advanced tool use and memory capabilities, making it ideal for complex software engineering and agent workflows.

‍

GPT-4.1 offers a strong, balanced upgrade over previous GPT models with improved coding, instruction following, and very large context support, optimized for developer use with latency and cost considerations.

‍

Gemini 2.5 emphasizes advanced reasoning, personalization, and deep research capabilities with massive multimodal and context support, positioning it as a highly intelligent, versatile assistant with native multimodal integration.

‍

Anthropic's Claude 4 strategy is clear: to lead in complex coding and long-duration AI tasks. While others focus on vast context or broad research, Claude 4 excels at sustained, reliable performance for demanding software work.

‍

Opus 4 is the powerhouse for these tough jobs, using its advanced tools and memory. Sonnet 4 offers a smart, efficient option for wider use. This focus, plus an emphasis on dependable AI, positions Claude 4 as the go-to for serious, in-depth AI collaboration.

‍

‍

Conclusion

‍

Let’s recap: we’ve seen that Claude 4 is designed to excel in coding and deep problem-solving. We looked at how Opus 4 and Sonnet 4 compare, and saw impressive results in many tests. We also explored Claude Code, a coding helper for developers.

‍

The key takeaway is this: Claude 4 represents a major step forward in AI capabilities, especially for complex tasks and long-running projects. It's not just about AI; it's about the future of how we work.

‍

Looking ahead, imagine teams where humans and AI work together seamlessly. Imagine AI agents that take on entire projects, with people focusing on creativity and big-picture ideas. Claude 4 is poised to be a key player in these changes.

‍

Ready to explore how Claude 4 can help you? Visit Claude, Claude Code, or the platform of your choice to learn more and see how it can make your work easier and more effective. Start exploring the future of AI today!

‍